Last night I was looking in the paper and then I came across a story about a Glasgow MSP that wants to stop vehicles from parking on pavements. The article was in the Evening Times, on page 2 and it was written by Stuart Paterson, political correspondent. The article caught my eye because I've seen double parking with my own eyes, and I know how disruptive it can be.
Earlier this year, the Evening Times reported residents in Yorkhill who are frustrated by double parking, cars left on pavements and blocking the way for others. The Glasgow MSP, Sandra White, wants to cut down the amount of cars being parked on the pavements. Sandra has backing from charities that represent visual impaired people and disabled people. A spokeswoman for Guide Dogs Scotland said "I don't there is a malice but inconsideration. The time is right for this..." Ms White has proposed a responsible parking bill to introduce enforcement. She was quoted saying "Pavements are for people, not cars. There are parts of Glasgow that have problems with double parking. If you're blind or in a wheelchair or with a pram, it is ridiculous. It is criminal that you can't walk on pavements." Charities are supporting the plan for this bill in the Scottish Parliament.
To conclude this story, I would like to give you my thoughts about parking on the pavements. I totally agree with Sandra White, parking on the pavements is a hazard for people with certain disabilities or children. The one thing I don't agree with is on her quotation, I think she was a little bit harsh when she used the word criminal. I agree that it shouldn't be happening, but I don't agree that it's a criminal offence.

Q1. Was it right to call it criminal?
Q2. Why do you think people park on pavements?
Q3. Would you park on the pavements, knowing it might block pedestrians?


